You really need some pets or to spend a few days on a farm.

You really need some pets or to spend a few days on a farm.

Give them our intelligence, our capacity to imagine and to communicate what we’ve imagined as well as our manual dexterity along with other physical flexibility and I doubt there’d be much difference. I don’t think it’s that complex. This sound like the simply version and not the one that is meant. Our society is terrible while dealing with multi-logical problems.Do you not think that we desperately need to understand CT, which attempts to help us understand how to think about multi-logical problems?

Do you not think that it is worth while for every adult to get up off their ‘intellectual couch’ and teach themselves CT? And they seem a lot better for it than chimps with their braggadocio accompanied by frequent outbreaks of violence and gorillas, who at least are a lot more peaceful than chimps in their daily family life, but who make life hard for the males having to compete for and defend their harem arrangements. Through dialogue each individual brings his/her point of view to the fore by proposing solutions constructed around their specific view. I think we humans start off with an empty canvas. The solution builds dialectically i.e. a thesis is developed and from this thesis and a contrasting antithesis is constructed a synthesis that takes into consideration both proposals.

A paradigm defines the theory, rules and standards of practice. “In the absence of a paradigm or some candidate for paradigm, all of the facts that could possible pertain to the development of a given science are likely to seem equally relevant.” Multi-logical problems are different in kind from mono-logical matters.Socratic dialogue is one technique for attempting to grapple with multi-logical problems; problems that are either not pattern like or that the pattern is too complex to ascertain. The same guy wants the girl. And human sexual behavior seems far less complex compared to our closest relative the bonobos. It’s really the hopefulness undimmed by real, human interaction that we regret for most of those relationships that never quite happened. It’s a small state somewhere on the east coast.

Each member of the family has a different point of view with differing needs and desires. There are other animals that have sex for fun or to maintain dominance or engage in homosexual behavior. I mean in terms of the actual sex acts. So, that causes a whole list of problems. Most problems that we face in our daily life are such multi-logical in nature. It is entirely up to your ability to paint on this canvas and the type of picture you want to paint, it can be simply, complicated, or whatever you want it to be.

Complex as in our sexual behaviour is a lot more varied than that of other species, as largely for pleasure-based and ritualistic purposes than other species. Originally Posted by adelady Complex as in our sexual behaviour is a lot more varied than that of other species, as largely for pleasure-based and ritualistic purposes than other species. You really need some pets or to spend a few days on a farm. From this a new synthesis a new thesis is developed.When we are dealing with mono-logical problems well circumscribed by algorithms the personal biases of the subject are of small concern.

Well, I’d suggest that our sexual behaviour is less varied than that of our closest relatives – bonobos. what about virgins? can they give their opinion here? Originally Posted by Flick Montana How is human sexual behavior complex?We dress up in our best plumage, spend the night trying to impress females with our mating dance, score some tail, then flee the territory if she ends up pregnant. Originally Posted by sarnamluvu Complex as in our sexual behaviour is a lot more varied than that of other species, as largely for pleasure-based and ritualistic purposes than other species. No but monkeys do. CT includes the knowledge of Logic 101 and also the knowledge that focuses upon the intellectual character and attitude of critical thinking. lol Cat and dog sex often involves oral sex and can be quite rough. They use multiple forms of sexual interactions with various partners as a way of reinforcing social bonds and for making other social interactions less stressful. One important task of dialogue is to illuminate these prejudices which may be quite subtle and often out of consciousness of the participant holding them.Our society is very good while dealing with mono-logical problems. The natural sciences—normal sciences—as Thomas Kuhn labels it in “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” move forward in a “successive transition from one paradigm to another”. Dogs, cats, horses, etc. don’t have BDSM or oral sex lol..

People are embarrassed about showing their feelings. IMO, most if not all human behaviours are observable (or will be in time) in the future. Is that all there is for you? Often these mono-logical matters have a paradigm. And they seem a lot better for it than chimps with their braggadocio accompanied by frequent outbreaks of violence and gorillas, who at least are a lot more peaceful than chimps in their daily family life, but who make life hard for the males having to compete for and defend their harem arrangements. This is a credit course that teaches the basic principles of reasoning.

Because the human brain is complex and we are no longer living in caves. Doesn’t quite make up for missed opportunities, but there’s no guarantee they would have turned out well anyway. It is not just touch and go, it is the very action of how we got here. because it involves the deeper aspect of ourselves we tend to most time stay on the surface and it needs diving skills into the unknown. But, they don’t know that.

Our sexual behaviour is also less ritualised than in bonobos. Everybody considers themselves to be a critical thinker. Simple problems that occur daily in family life are examples.

In multi-logical problems, without the advantage of paradigms and algorithms, the biases of the problem solvers become a serious source of error. What exactly is it about our sexual behavior that you don’t think exists elsewhere in the animal kingdom? I would like to take this a step further by saying that I wish to claim that fact knowledge is mono-logical and relationship knowledge is multi-logical.Mono-logical matters have one set of principles guiding their solution. what is CT? How many other mammals have breast sex? or BDSM? fetishes such as balloon, foot, etc? oh, and in the other thread about psychology, you posted about people being so nice lol.. as I say, humans are flippant… Well, I’d suggest that our sexual behaviour is less varied than that of our closest relatives – bonobos. All participants in the dialogue come at the solution from the logic of their views. Because it is buried deep into the emotional sphere, you can only approach it from a feeling perspective.

SOME ASSEMBLY REQUIREDInsert tab A into slot B So, that causes a whole list of problems. Originally Posted by organic god what is CT? CT is an acronym for Critical Thinking. That is why we need to differentiate among different levels of critical thinking.Most people fall in the category that I call Reagan thinkers—trust but verify. To start anything on earth it appears very hard and it repeats itself at the very end.Sex is the beginning and the end, to navigate through this field, takes courage and commitment.

Our advanced (relative to the other life on this planet) social behaviors can lead to a lot of emotion in a relationship, but our sexual behavior isn’t all that unique. Then there are those who have taken the basic college course taught by the philosophy dept that I call Logic 101. Our sexual behaviour is also less ritualised than in bonobos. But how likely is that, and how unlikely is it that there’ll never be another? Most of the problems we constantly face are not readily solved by mathematics because they are not pattern specific and are multi-logical.Dialogue is a technique for mutual consideration of such problems wherein solutions grow in a dialectical manner. Now that we can indulge in the comforts of life and don’t have to worry about keeping ourselves from being eaten by animals constantly (well, I don’t know about you…), we have time to explore our sexuality.Conversely, complex sexuality can just be a form of classical conditioning, in which case cavemen were perfectly capable of it – associating certain things or objects with the desired end result. Because it has so many ups and downs. (warning: you just read a poorly executed sexual joke) Our advanced (relative to the other life on this planet) social behaviors can lead to a lot of emotion in a relationship, but our sexual behavior isn’t all that unique. A girl wants a guy. Morality is About RelationshipsI suspect that most of us are willing to agree that, broadly speaking, we have ‘fact knowledge’ and ‘relationship knowledge’.

Originally Posted by Stargate it involves the deeper aspect of ourselves we tend to most time stay on the surface and it needs diving skills into the unknown. They use multiple forms of sexual interactions with various partners as a way of reinforcing social bonds and for making other social interactions less stressful. Does’t it? Yes it does.What does ‘ontological grounding’ mean, and how does it apply to morality? I mean in terms of the actual sex acts. Related Discussions:Ethics & Morality in Family Tribal Pre-Historic Isolation.Is there a Rational Ground for Morality?EnglishThe Morality Arguementcan universal morality be proven?Define depth of interpersonal relationshipsmoralitySecular Moral PhilosophyLove conquers all. yes, goats use erotic asphyxiation…though i would agree that humans are simply at the upper end of the intelligence spectrum. Originally Posted by sculptor SOME ASSEMBLY REQUIREDInsert tab A into slor B Tab A is pretty universal, it can fit into slots B, C or D. Dogs, cats, horses, etc. don’t have BDSM or oral sex lol… What exactly is it about our sexual behavior that you don’t think exists elsewhere in the animal kingdom?

That’s a broad brush you are using, it sounds extremely uncolored. Of course, a philosophy of nursing essay
person need not take the college course and can learn the matter on their own effort, but I suspect few do that.The third level I call CT (Critical Thinking). And anyone who has a male dog knows that they often have a pretty strong leg fetish . . . I don’t think it’s that complex.

Originally Posted by sarnamluvu Well humans have a variety of different sex acts, and reasons for sex acts. There are other animals that have sex for fun or to maintain dominance or engage in homosexual behavior. Originally Posted by Flick Montana Originally Posted by sarnamluvu Complex as in our sexual behaviour is a lot more varied than that of other species, as largely for pleasure-based and ritualistic purposes than other species. Have you ever seen dogs or goats acting out sexually? They’ll do more or less anything with pretty well anything. animate or inanimate.

Most people get past that eventually. They might have been wonderful.